I Agree With Ed Koch about Sarah Palin

The first time I had a chance to vote for Ed Koch, the 1977 Democratic primary for mayor of New York City, I voted against him, and in favor of some guy named Mario Cuomo. Koch won and was easily re-elected mayor that fall.
The second time I had a chance to vote for Ed Koch, the 1982 Democratic primary for governor of New York State, I voted against him, and in favor of some guy named Mario Cuomo. Cuomo won and was easily elected governor of New York.
In 2004, Koch, ostensibly a Democrat, supported the re-election of GW Bush. So, I'm not a big fan of Edward I. Koch. And yet...

When Ed Koch says that a Sarah Palin presidency 'scares' him, that resonates with me.

Look, I can get into a rhetorical debate about this - and BTW, the Librarians against Palin website points out that she probably meant "theoretical" when she talked about her "rhetorical" book ban. And yes, I know the banned book list floating around the Internet has been debunked, but there are still questions to be resolved.

But I didn't need the word of the former New York City mayor to tip me off. Frankly, her responses in the Gibson/ABC News interview were often troubling. Is it that she really WANTS to go to war with Russia AND Iran? Does she assume that Israel should have carte blanche? A scary interview.

At least she "clarified" her Bridge to Nowhere position during the interviews, though she returned to the lie two days later. Even Pat Buchanan says she's being trained to "parrot the McCain-neocon line", contrary to her own earlier beliefs.

I do wonder about Troopergate as much as how it reflects her governing style as the specific facts in the case. And has been the role of Alaska's "first dude"?

Know that I don't care particularly about Sarah Palin's 17-year-old pregnant daughter. I do, however, care about her position of forcing "abstinence-only education" down the throats of the school districts. (Hey, send money to Parenthood in Sarah Palin's name!) And I can't help but wonder: How well would Barack Obama have done if he had come forth with a 17 year old pregnant, unmarried, unemployed daughter? And speaking of sex, Sarah Palin's "hotness" factor, which I know liberal bloggers are tired of hearing about, but which voters may be responding to initially, won't be enough the more voters learn more about her.

Even the resident conservative of The View, Elisabeth Hasselback thought that Obama's "lipstick on a pig", a phrase used by John McCain regarding Hillary Clinton's health care policies, was a non-issue. Ah, politics of distraction. The handlers at least are on script as they play the gender card. I will say this - Sarah Palin does snark well - and are community organizers, which would have included my late father, ticked.

Having said all that, I've pretty much tired of talking about Palin - well, maybe not this Palin. Until Sarah does something else totally outrageous, I'll let others carry that ball. I'd rather discuss about the top of the ticket, John McCain.

If I were a Republican in 2000 and voting in the primary, I likely would have gone for John McCain, certainly over George W. Bush. While I was mildly troubled by that Keating Five thing involving the Savings & Loan disaster of the 1980s, he seemed like an honorable guy. In this lengthy (30 minute) piece, Joe Biden talks, among other things, how badly he felt when the forces of W. vilified McCain before the South Carolina primary that year:

Since he had been tortured himself, he was sensitive to a strong anti-torture policy for the United States, and I applauded that.

So how the hell did the 'Straight Talk Express' get so derailed? More than anger, I have a profound disappointment that the Arizona senator has sunk to such levels that even Karl Rove says McCain is lying in his ads.

A raspberry to the MSM here. It took Comedy Central's the Daily Show, FCOL, to show how McCain's 2008 talking points about working with Democrats, et al was almost verbatim what W said in 2000 - anyone have that link? - and we all know how well THAT worked. Obama gets knocked for wanting to talk to Iran, but - surprise - five former U.S. Secretaries of State are saying the same thing.

McCain's self-declared lack of strength in the economic side is problematic. His economic policy, deemed 'incomplete' by the hardly liberal US News makes the rich richer. He declares that fundamentals of the economy are strong even as Wall Street collapses. McCain, the computer illiterate is the one I find "out of touch". And it saddens me. Earlier this year, Wesley Clark, that is, General Wesley Clark, got in trouble for suggesting that John McCain's war record was not an automatic qualifier for the Presidency; he wasn't wrong, merely impolitic. America is guns AND butter.

I'll be mentioning McCain again, I suspect.


ROG