1994: the non-crossover #1s, AC and RB
10 hours ago
I've moved the blog, but here is the blogroll, mine and others I follow.
Check Page Rank of your Web site pages instantly: |
This page rank checking tool is powered by Page Rank Checker service |
6 comments:
Thank you! It has crossed my mind several times that I should go back and revisit this bit of McCain's history before voting.
I'll bookmark this and come back to check out the links. Thanks for doing all the research!
"McCain Turns Irritable, Sarcastic to Media" I'm not supporting him, but this is not what he needs to be doing- http://tinyurl.com/4bxx28 or http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/mccain_sarcastic/2008/10/01/136317.html?s=al&promo_code=6BF4-1
Very informative and timely post for the letter K on ABC Wednesday.
Bear((( )))
I didn't know anything about this. Thanks for sharing! Welcome to ABC Wednesday. It's a lot of fun : ). God bless you this week!
Thanks so much for this. We are so aware of the elections here in UK but I guess the skeletons were there all along!
Thanks for joining in!
Sigh. Guilt-by-association smears are slimy. Sarah Palin should be ashamed of herself.
The Pharisees smeared Jesus by pointing out that he was keeping the company of prostitues, sinners, tax-collectors.
Who anybody is friendly with is an irrelevant distraction and is character assasination.
What is important is specific actions, especially actions taken in the context of public service.
John McCain was not censured by the Senate Ethics Committee, true. But he was NOT EXONERATED by that body. He was, in fact, reprimanded. How convenient that this fact gets swept under the rug by McCain supporters.
"Exercising questionable judgement" is the phrase, and it's an exceedingly valid point for discussion, particularly when McCain brags about being "exonerated" in this affair.
I think we need officials who don't "exercise questionable judgement" in their official capacities.
Post a Comment